commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [discovery] org.apache.commons.discovery.log?!?
Date Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:15:51 GMT
Hi Jorg,
[discovery] has already been depending to commons-logging (at least
from 0.4, released on 2008), I just limited to upgrade it to latest
stable version.
Any suggestion?
I filled a new jira issue to discuss about it DISCOVERY-15
Danke,
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Jörg Schaible
<joerg.schaible@scalaris.com> wrote:
> Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
>> Hi all guys,
>> since I'm in the middle of the process of [discovery] review, I'd like
>> to discuss a little about the 'log' package[1]: It is a
>> commons-logging implementation wrapper that I don't understand the
>> reason why it has be implemented :(
>> Moreover the 90% of classes that use a Log instance, have a static
>> setter method...
>>
>> I'd tend to remove that package and use commons-logging in the
>> traditional way, WDYT?
>
> IIRC discovery was also used as a jar ca be put into lib/endorsed. Having
> references there to commons-logging (or slf4j) would be fatal.
>
> - Jörg
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message