commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject [lang] Pair vs. [collection] org.apache.commons.collections.keyvalue
Date Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:31:00 GMT
Hi All:

I am now realize that what we are stumbling along with Pair has already been
done in org.apache.commons.collections.keyvalue, generics and all. Different
class names but the same ideas.

So... it sure would be nice to avoid creating the same thing in [lang] but
with different class names.

What are our options:
- Continue blindly
- Converge both components on the same class names. [lang] has 3 classes,
[collections] has 8.
- Drop Pair in favor of org.apache.commons.collections.keyvalue.

I feel we need a good story here before releasing 3.0 with 3 new Pair
classes.

Thoughts?

-- 
Thank you,
Gary

http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
http://garygregory.com/
http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message