Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gudnabrsam@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=woZLl6Y1tER6/zpEP4sVQ6uOWvdS0WwpRJXnmnyCVhMwTWan+S5tp1fn5Ey2855XCY
         HvMnff6cqxZikZbK5OOKUJM4NLj+w/duWqPDd/Jc/+cYBQtjoUNH8m1WbNxYXAPp6m17
         vR0lQ3MP4h5R42FERn8bMmidH/YM2m69iUG+I=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: gudnabrsam@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <4D86532A.3050504@free.fr>
References: <4D864730.8010707@gmail.com>
	<4D86532A.3050504@free.fr>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:14:37 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTikn5HStL_gB=NymxPYaS23VKO3zHkVomqENR2qz@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [math] RandomData/RandomDataImpl
From: Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Luc Maisonobe <Luc.Maisonobe@free.fr> wrot=
e:
> Le 20/03/2011 19:28, Phil Steitz a =E9crit :
>> Quite a few methods have been added to RandomDataImpl that are not
>> in RandomData. =A0The methods were added to the impl class only to
>> preserve backward compatibility in versions 1 and 2. =A0In 3.0, we now
>> have the choice to add the methods to the interface or even dispense
>> with the interface altogether. =A0Personally, I am leaning in the
>> direction to just make RandomData a concrete class and move the
>> implementations in RandomDataImpl into that class. =A0Early on, we
>> thought that RandomData might be a relatively small but useful
>> interface. =A0What I think now is that the more valuable
>> interface/implementation separation is at the lower level of random
>> generators, which is enabled in RandomDataImpl.
>>
>> What do others think about this?
>
> I also think the RandomDataImpl layer adds too much complexity for users.
> +1 to merge it in RandomData.
>

I don't follow [math] that closely, but the above isn't what I read
from Phil's original mail.  :/

Matt

> Luc
>
>>
>> Phil
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org