Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12443 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2011 16:44:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Mar 2011 16:44:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 69855 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 16:44:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 69777 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 16:44:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 69769 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2011 16:44:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:44:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ole.ersoy@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.43] (HELO mail-gw0-f43.google.com) (74.125.83.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:44:21 +0000 Received: by gwj21 with SMTP id 21so609370gwj.30 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:44:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+19XMq6hDdRAhAz951FTO6+DFFL6dnAs7LsTNBk12wo=; b=biTANDxjrEJg8eB8ojDKUPVEBHNHd7plWbBR9sQkG6lwnFwblYjo5uTpB0JvoRVh7J 4LXHJmsELcQPtSik+tmhyai7ABqNcNC6o4DumaLKFUb0kdOkES+QUsASvSf75DSyAh1t 8hqUdQLvcymXYoMMwqgcLlMrW74ppLRZYNx/c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ls758sGwFzYD75Ka2g2jWCEdFGgrWHeAFir5tVoL1ZJ3bSPL9OCbc602e6djtfSwtD cM4osksnQ6xky5zit3hSeXcUirUKtRWAo7oEwzuQqZrPAm+ryJkCWSb5umenEC9FSqsD Ce4+LYcXY1bEB/RowV/bHq40qLDc6alPdLzRo= Received: by 10.151.99.21 with SMTP id b21mr1875242ybm.57.1301503440187; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:44:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ole.pyramidetechnologies.com (c-98-193-75-124.hsd1.il.comcast.net [98.193.75.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p33sm2451403ybk.17.2011.03.30.09.43.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:43:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D935DC7.8010706@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:43:51 -0500 From: Ole Ersoy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100907 Fedora/3.0.7-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [Math] What's the problem with interfaces? References: <20110330001532.GB6084@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> <20110330121530.GM2279@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> In-Reply-To: <20110330121530.GM2279@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > I think that you reason on the basic assumption that CM is close to > stability. Many problems (some bugs but also design consistency) have shown > that it is not. So, my opinion is that users will prefer a product that > continues to improve rather than something that is backward-compatible. I'm > one of those. If not, I'd be content with what is there and would not feel > the need to contribute. I'm a user as well and agree with this. I'd gladly deal with upgrading my code and configuration if it means that CM has gotten more elegant from an architectural point of view. Cheers, - Ole --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org