From dev-return-124384-apmail-commons-dev-archive=commons.apache.org@commons.apache.org Wed Mar 02 07:26:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99374 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 07:26:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 07:26:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 46769 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 07:25:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 46463 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 07:25:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 46455 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 07:25:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 07:25:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jak-commons-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.12 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.12] (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 07:25:48 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PugR3-0006dY-Je for dev@commons.apache.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 08:25:25 +0100 Received: from mail.elsag-solutions.com ([62.154.225.82]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 08:25:25 +0100 Received: from joerg.schaible by mail.elsag-solutions.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 08:25:25 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@commons.apache.org From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmc=?= Schaible Subject: Re: OGNL as a part of Commons Followup-To: gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 08:25:12 +0100 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <1299001076493-3330241.post@n4.nabble.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: mail.elsag-solutions.com User-Agent: KNode/4.4.9 Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Based on what I know of OGNL, it is/was reasonably well used. Trying > to merge it into another project doesn't help those existing users. > > The question is what are the author(s) of OGNL looking for? A home for > maintainance? The Apache brand? To reinvigorate it? The latter fits > with a merger into other projects. The former should make commons ask > if it wants to become a home for maintainance mode (not necessarily a > bad thing). > > I'm certainly arguing against a straight push into BeanUtils or JEXL. +1 - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org