commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [discuss][Digester] The future of Digester an the Digester3 in sandbox - Take2
Date Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:37:23 GMT
Hi all guys,
looks like there's not enough activity/interest on new Digester, I
suggest to suspend this topic for a while and come speaking about it
until there will be interest from the users.
Thanks to all that took part of the discussion!
All the best, have a nice day,
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Simone Tripodi
<simonetripodi@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
> thanks for the trust guys!!! I won't express my vote, it would be too
> incorrect IMHO. I'll keep my finger crossed to see at least the 3
> consensus :)
> Have a nice weekend!
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 19, 2011, at 11:05 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 3/19/11 4:54 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>>>> Hi Rahul,
>>>>> thanks once again for the wise suggestions, much more than appreciated!
>>>>>
>>>>> I underestimated the importance of the users over the active
>>>>> developers, so I totally agree with you, moving to dormant is
>>>>> premature.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was aware about breaking APIs compatibility, since we had to face
>>>>> the same problem also in [pool2], I thought it would have been a good
>>>>> idea implementing the sandbox in the o.a.c.digester3[1] package, looks
>>>>> like it is compliant to the suggestions you proposed.
>>>>>
>>>>> I like your idea of branching 1.X, 2.X and put 3 on trunk, shall we
>>>>> call a vote before going on?
>>>> +1
>>>> I don't think we need a VOTE on this, I would say wait a couple of more days
to make sure we have (lazy) consensus and then just do it.
>>>>
>>> <snip/>
>>>
>>> Not that I care for more process, but I'd like to see 3+ of us say
>>> this is the API they'd like to see for digester3. We also generally
>>> require votes for getting stuff out of sandbox so a vote may not be a
>>> bad idea (even if this isn't a new component, its a new API -- and
>>> somewhere in there, the lines are blurred). I'm +0.
>>>
>>
>> I hesitate to throw in an opinion as I've never really used digester, but I quite
like the API personally, and would +1 this.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>> -Rahul
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message