commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [discuss][Digester] The future of Digester an the Digester3 in sandbox
Date Sat, 05 Mar 2011 18:24:22 GMT
Hi Rahul,
sorry if I'm late, unfortunately I got distracted by other stuff :P
I uploaded the Digester3 documentation in the Sandbox site space[1],
and added a (poor, maybe) page[2] about differences between Digester
and Digester3.
Feel free to ping me whenever you want for clarifications!!!
Have a nice weekend,
Simo

[1] http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/digester3/
[2] http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/digester3/guide/dvsd3.html

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Simone Tripodi <simonetripodi@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Rahul!!!
> sure of course, I'll prepare a special section on the documentation to
> see a Digester->Digester3 migration scenario, so that also users can
> know pros and cons.
> Thanks for your support!
> have a nice day,
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Simone Tripodi
>> <simonetripodi@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Good morning all guys,
>>> in the last month I've invested my spare time on redesigning a new
>>> potential version of the Digester component in Sandbox, according to
>>> what I proposed time ago on dev ML[1].
>>> The experiment is complete at 95%, is not of course a release but
>>> there are enough tests/samples/docs to start playing with it.
>>> I also sent an email to users ML[2] requesting for feedbacks,
>>> unfortunately no one expressed his opinion yet, but I'll be patient at
>>> least for the next 2-3 weeks before pushing a request again.
>>>
>>> I'd like to ask also your feedbacks and suggestions, in case you would
>>> be interested in a potential promotion on Proper, or it should be
>>> contributed somewhere else like extras, but I hope it will find a
>>> place in commons.
>>> As Rahul proposed, since there are APIs breakage, maybe it should be
>>> taken in consideration as a new component, but at the same time as
>>> Matt suggested, since it processes inputs in the same way, maybe is
>>> just a major release.
>>>
>>> WDT? What are your thoughts about it?
>> <snip/>
>>
>> Can we see a "before and after" i.e. show API usages on either when
>> parsing the same sample?
>>
>> As an aside, I'd suggest we all start new threads for peripheral
>> discussions i.e. not directly about future of digester (such as
>> suppressing unchecked warnings, we don't want to fill this important
>> thread with that :-).
>>
>> -Rahul
>>
>>
>>> Sorry if it looks like a silly
>>> question but I've never taken part of a sandbox promotion.
>>> Looking forward to hear from you, have a nice day!
>>> Simo
>>>
>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/5ry2lmfkpxkrqwh6
>>> [2] http://markmail.org/message/qybp7ra3g5tpeayi
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message