Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67172 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2011 17:18:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2011 17:18:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 65406 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2011 17:18:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 64805 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2011 17:18:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 64796 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2011 17:18:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 17:18:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gudnabrsam@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.171] (HELO mail-wy0-f171.google.com) (74.125.82.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 17:18:10 +0000 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so564661wyg.30 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 09:17:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=r6FFT6t9qerWdswRsnWdCi6XTynQpI6RjuI95rsFUKI=; b=uBdWOMs9jGOEA7YjmGIVM15cAzJQ5WQR5+8bStTtf++s6k3YVb3ixRzek+gpsuGIvD 8L16gj1yXq+Fata9CM7zydqBPnCY26QslokBWjpT6jR6gA5fQPdzCELGbocCudH3FOP5 2wiV6w2DyAAp5oRWBpmyaJWl/pxgBZ55dSfYQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; b=Jh9oU2pKc2eLo4cHtBAPe/ZrZhzQgAZCgr41sSSTweJXFT1yR5h06YTFTYCtojRUvJ q8BJ2fP2m5K2bNApXRQ4GhZCMDEzfGCbSh8zhhQCP7ib8gGi4HK6BLoU17N2qjkFkP9h Rh0v+BYap6UI0N4Jfnfb8eEkiibUhODBIfCAc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.166.67 with SMTP id f45mr1265491wel.112.1298222269143; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 09:17:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.157.8 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 09:17:49 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: gudnabrsam@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 11:17:49 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [collections] retire or release? From: Matt Benson To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636427249312549049cb9edee --001636427249312549049cb9edee Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Obviously it sucks how long it's been since we've had a release. Apparently Stephen C was the heart & soul of the project. :) I've been trying to make a little time for it lately, but it would seem that several of us across the project have been somewhat short of time for the past couple of years now. I just hate to see us retire it when we're *so* close to having 4.0 ready.... aren't we? Matt On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Release, then retire? > > > On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Seeing this bug reported for the Nth time: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-371 > > > > I wonder if collections should be declared dead. It's a dumb bug, > > (removeAll calling retainAll), and users have had to put up with it > > for years now. > > > > Hen > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > -- > I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --001636427249312549049cb9edee--