Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of miccagiann@gmail.com designates
 209.85.160.171 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=Q1wSDD7Xjc7dsNUvVaIZkBcBpLQLpgD8AiiXxBV8Pr2T2vBfK9htY0l52lXtUwp2ZW
         m22Z2H43ixxcSUyWFde2B4Vr3o4XR3Y2Mkg8lYsTUxjWdGpoy65sFT3HU0BAGecJkwcB
         9CVAzJYagzvRFSpv3jv+JHtspMJhgQUjO49Us=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4D55B5DD.20000@gmail.com>
References: <4D5576B4.8080203@free.fr>
	<4D557ADF.3090407@gmail.com>
	<4D5585C7.5000102@free.fr>
	<4D558CAD.4090006@gmail.com>
	<4D5595F6.4070907@free.fr>
	<4D559D42.7030806@gmail.com>
	<4D559F39.1030405@free.fr>
	<4D55A2DF.4080103@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikpqxpw3L2ViB090O_yBnJZCq-mWFzdy26ZEe5C@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D55B5DD.20000@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 09:24:41 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimCyOOu8isPUnORFxgkXCaYG6_o6007=3Ti+-E5@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [math] the 2.2 release saga conclusion ?
From: Michael Giannakopoulos <miccagiann@gmail.com>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd5cf30436a93049c10b53f

--000e0cd5cf30436a93049c10b53f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi guys,
As far as exceptions is concerned it is a major change in the code and
leaving it out from the 2.2 release is a good idea. About the exceptions i
would like to point that in some cases new exceptions are needed so as to be
more clear to developers which one of them to use...

>
>This is by no means a perfect solution, I really tried to reach a
>compromise between several points of view. As each compromise, everyone
>would have something to tell against it but please don't start another
>lengthy discussion and even less a flame war. There is no hidden
>intention behind this and the choices presented would be put only in 2.2
>branch, not in trunk. The only intention is to be able to publish 2.2.

Luc what do you mean by this? There are two versions of code out there?
Sorry for these questions but this is new to me...

I'm willing to help so as to publish 2.2. Thank you all for your time!

Best regards,
Giannakopoulos Michael

--000e0cd5cf30436a93049c10b53f--