Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4D5576B4.8080203@free.fr>
References: <4D5576B4.8080203@free.fr>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:07:00 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTik-iRZmLDOy+17VpqqxPc=hZ-Kg_pHGe+npkwRU@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [math] the 2.2 release saga conclusion ?
From: Mikkel Meyer Andersen <mikl@mikl.dk>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba539fb49347fa049c059047

--90e6ba539fb49347fa049c059047
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Luc,

+1
Thanks for the constructive post. I agree with the compromise although I
don't have the entire outlook of pros and cons.

Cheers, Mikkel.
Den 11/02/2011 18.50 skrev "Luc Maisonobe" <Luc.Maisonobe@free.fr>:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to have 2.2 out as soon as possible. I would like to
> propose yet another intermediate solution, not a perfect one, but trying
> to mitigate everything that has been said here. Remember this is *only*
> for 2.2 and it does *not* mean anything about 3.0 or any further
> discussions.
>
> So I propose we release 2.2 with the following changes relative to what
> is currently in the repository:
>
> - change FunctionEvaluationException, DerivativeException and
> MatrixVisitorException to unchecked again by making them
> extend o.a.c.math.exception.MathUserException
> - change ConvergenceException to unchecked by making it extend
> o.a.c.math.exception.MathIllegalStateException
> - undeprecate all these exceptions
> - accept the 17 CLIRR errors remaining after these changes
> (13 related to exceptions, 4 related to ODE)
> - accept the 30 CLIRR warnings remaining after these changes
> (all of them related to exceptions)
> - accept the 422 CLIRR infos remaining after these changes
>
> This is by no means a perfect solution, I really tried to reach a
> compromise between several points of view. As each compromise, everyone
> would have something to tell against it but please don't start another
> lengthy discussion and even less a flame war. There is no hidden
> intention behind this and the choices presented would be put only in 2.2
> branch, not in trunk. The only intention is to be able to publish 2.2.
>
> What do you think ?
>
> Luc
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>

--90e6ba539fb49347fa049c059047--