commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [collections] retire or release?
Date Tue, 22 Feb 2011 04:54:45 GMT
Gmail f*cked me over:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: [collections] retire or release?
To: Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>




On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd like to see a 3.3; I think we have a branch that had a lot of
> bugfixes on it before the 4.0 merge.
>
>
+1, if for no other reason than to announce (some of?) the deprecations
planned in 4.0 (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-251).


> 4.0 - painful to have a working product there and not release, yet not
> sure there's much point if there isn't enough energy to do subsequent
> releases.
>
> Point taken, but as mature as the codebase is, and let's face it--it's
still mostly the same codebase--I wouldn't expect ongoing maintenance to be
nearly the chore that getting 4.0 ready has been.

Matt


> Hen
>
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Obviously it sucks how long it's been since we've had a release.
>  Apparently
> > Stephen C was the heart & soul of the project.  :)  I've been trying to
> make
> > a little time for it lately, but it would seem that several of us across
> the
> > project have been somewhat short of time for the past couple of years
> now.
> >  I just hate to see us retire it when we're *so* close to having 4.0
> > ready.... aren't we?
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
> > <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Release, then retire?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > Seeing this bug reported for the Nth time:
> >> >
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-371
> >> >
> >> > I wonder if collections should be declared dead. It's a dumb bug,
> >> > (removeAll calling retainAll), and users have had to put up with it
> >> > for years now.
> >> >
> >> > Hen
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message