Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 52184 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2011 13:11:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2011 13:11:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 68231 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2011 13:11:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 67939 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2011 13:11:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 67931 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2011 13:11:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:11:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.74.71.226] (HELO payne.is.scarlet.be) (193.74.71.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:11:33 +0000 Received: from mail.harfang.homelinux.org (ip-62-235-229-11.dsl.scarlet.be [62.235.229.11]) by payne.is.scarlet.be (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0ODBBoZ020614 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:11:12 +0100 Received: from localhost (mail.harfang.homelinux.org [192.168.20.11]) by mail.harfang.homelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F404F61808 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:11:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.harfang.homelinux.org ([192.168.20.11]) by localhost (mail.harfang.homelinux.org [192.168.20.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3RuM3YOJxpO5 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:11:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from dusk.harfang.homelinux.org (mail.harfang.homelinux.org [192.168.20.11]) by mail.harfang.homelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FD0617ED for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:11:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from eran by dusk.harfang.homelinux.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PhMCK-00021D-Ew for dev@commons.apache.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:11:08 +0100 Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:11:06 +0100 From: Gilles Sadowski To: dev@commons.apache.org Subject: [Math] FastMath Performance (Was: [jira] Resolved: (MATH-493) ...) Message-ID: <20110124131106.GG23209@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: dev@commons.apache.org References: <11270769.115901295644326004.JavaMail.jira@thor> <11142300.152571295873443538.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <11142300.152571295873443538.JavaMail.jira@thor> X-Operating-System: Tiny Tux X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: 53B9 972E C2E6 B93C BEAD 7092 09E6 AF46 51D0 5641 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi. > Sebb resolved MATH-493. > ----------------------- > > Resolution: Fixed > > Fixed by using the Harmony code. > > Note: this appears to be at least as quick as StrictMath on Sun Java 1.6 in a crude test The performance comparison for "FastMath" should be against "Math", as "StrictMath is expected to be slow(er). [That's why I've added the calls to "Math" in the performance unit tests.] Regards, Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org