From dev-return-123320-apmail-commons-dev-archive=commons.apache.org@commons.apache.org Thu Jan 13 16:52:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58079 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 16:52:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 16:52:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 81969 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 16:52:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 81714 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 16:52:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 81703 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 16:52:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:52:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of phil.steitz@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.43] (HELO mail-bw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.214.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:51:56 +0000 Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so1732003bwz.30 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:51:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=CmqZ4g4ubVdxPgg14CtHTzdzTtaXlzve203e/s56r1g=; b=cWPSGnbMcDXmGBNAGaRDrQmNRC+lTvrY5mnncp/ZIFpsEfRDBWTkEahkWDB5BqL2u7 XmRaelvmL87H3SRPgnaQO/Lr1yfjcCxiitBncb6ln415OGw2X9d6y/8HCtPPlxzc2mXs ENSlhV3+Q8rh1ZvN5zPt14lS2GWQPAsqst0qM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=LKrfeGUUFenmudcxtdSjqO+Vt4uvB90HdqZZjCcstbXO1s3rsHCQFqZG4/2H71rz7S 2qpb8JMmPrldVSlYywMCdvz8D0Zxak0EigDzZp5YRUX36juf66tuhbGtJH+/4YL2Q6+O 8ks0P91NN7DSHcJHLMeOwaFEyBHuKdi2J55sA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.24.9 with SMTP id t9mr1979031bkb.183.1294937495164; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:51:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.48.141 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:51:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:51:35 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [all] ASF branding and trademarks guidelines From: Phil Steitz To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think we are in pretty good shape in terms of complying with the guidelines [1] that all projects are expected to get into full compliance with early this year (i.e., RSN). I see one very small issue and one rather larger one. The small issue is the lack of a "Security" link in our nav. Otherwise, I think we are in good shape on all items on the checklist, other than trademark attributions. Personally, I see no value in claiming trademark on "Apache Commons" or "Commons foo" for any of our beloved [foo] and I have no desire and limited ability to add little "TM" symbols to all of the gimp-generated logos that we have on component pages. Before I ask forgiveness from the ASF trademark gods on this, I need to make sure that the community is in agreement. If not, then we need to get to work adding the little "TMs" and trademark footers. What do others think about this? Also, Henri or someone more knowledgeable on the trademark stuff please educate me if I am incorrectly characterizing our options / requirements. Please also have a look at [1] and confirm that I have not missed anything else that we need to do. Thanks! Phil [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org