commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [MATH] FastMath bug fixes - should they be in changes.xml?
Date Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:26:59 GMT
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:30 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 24 January 2011 13:01,  <luc.maisonobe@free.fr> wrote:
>> Hi Sebb,
>>
>> ----- "sebb" <sebbaz@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> Just had a sudden thought - FastMath is new to 2.2 and 3.0, so does
>>> it
>>> make sense to list all its bug fixes in the changes document?
>>
>> As long as their are Jira issues on them, I think they should be referenced.
>
> But the point is, that these are not changes from the previous
> version, because there was no previous version.
>
> BTW, I've marked all the issues with appliesTo and Fixfor as 2.2&3.0,
> so it's easy to see that the code was fixed before initial release.
>
We have run into this before in [math] and other components.  I agree
with Luc that it is better to list the changes in the changelog in
chronological order.

Phil
>> Luc
>>
>>>
>>> [If we do list them, I think they should be numerically ordered]
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message