commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1
Date Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:08:05 GMT
On 12 January 2011 23:37, Niall Pemberton <niall.pemberton@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Gary Gregory
> <GGregory@seagullsoftware.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 16:11, "Niall Pemberton" <niall.pemberton@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Niall Pemberton
>>> <niall.pemberton@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> I will test the release in the next couple of days, but I have one
>>>>> comment on the release notes.  Not enough for a -1 by itself, worth
>>>>> talking about if you roll another RC.
>>>>>
>>>>> I like the format and content of the release notes.  I don't much like
>>>>> the heading "TASKS IN 2.6" over the list of resolved issues classified
>>>>> as "update" in changes.xml, though.
>>>>
>>>> I was trying to separate out changes that didn't actually affect the
>>>> code from the actual software bug fixes/enhancments. I take your point
>>>> though and I will fix it in the branch so that if a new RC is
>>>> required, then it will be fixed.
>>>
>>> OK I updated the following which will be ported to the trunk:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang/upgradeto2_6.html
>>> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang/changes-report.html
>>>
>> Oh since we're nit pickin'. It would be nice to have some words in the description
column of the changes report HTML.
>
> I added something, but feel free to change/improve:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang/changes-report.html

That also refers to "2,5" (sic) - fixed in SVN
>
> Niall
>
>> Gary
>>
>>> Niall
>>>
>>>>>   The text descriptions are taken
>>>>> from the issue descriptions and refer to the enhancement request,
>>>>> e.g., "Javadoc is incorrect for lastIndexOf() method"  Labeling these
>>>>> as "tasks" leaves open the interpretation that these are known,
>>>>> unresolved issues.  I think it is better to either just lump them with
>>>>> the "adds" or use labels like "New Features" (for the adds) and
>>>>> "Enhancements" or "Updates" for the "updates."
>>>>
>>>> I look at re-doing the changes.xml - since the site isn't part of the
>>>> release and I will be copying the new 2.6 elements over to the trunk's
>>>> changes.xml if/when the 2.6 release goes out.
>>>>
>>>> Niall
>>>>
>>>>> Phil
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message