commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <GGreg...@seagullsoftware.com>
Subject RE: [lang] What's left for 3.0?
Date Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:22:38 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flamefew@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 03:04
> To: Commons Developers List; gudnabrsam@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [lang] What's left for 3.0?
> 
> 3 issues now, by punting the three non-blockers up to 3.1.
> 
> Mostly it means that we need to decide what to do on LANG-624 and then
> get releasing.
> 
> Hen

Getting close... :) I agree with the punting. Release early, release often.

Gary

> 
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> > And now down to 6 issues.
> >
> > 1 of them is a non-issue for release (JDK 1.7 has bugs); 1 is
> documentation.
> >
> > Of the other 4:
> >
> > LANG-462 - FastDateFormat supporting parse.  Need to look at the
> > patches. Blocker for 3.0.
> > LANG-544 - ToStringStyle.registry thread issues.   Need to consider
> > solution. Not a blocker for 3.0 imo.
> > LANG-624 - java.version vs java.specification.version.  I'm +1 to
> > moving to specification.version. Blocker for 3.0.
> > LANG-288 - StrTokenizer needs to support access to the token
> > separators.  It's an enhancement; while now is the time to implement
> > this, no one has. I'm thinking it should be punted to 3.1 and if the
> > solution involves incompatibility, it can wait for 4.0.
> >
> > So mostly we need to look at LANG-462, and resolve the debate on LANG-
> 624.
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I took care of a few issues. 9 left to go; or they need to be declared
> >> as 'fix in 3.1 or 4.0'. I think at this point that anything that is a
> >> backwards incompatibility but not for 3.0 (i.e. the potential 4.0)
> >> should be resolved as 'wontfix'. The StrTokenizer issue jumps to mind.
> >>
> >> Also need to look for TODO statements in the code; I think I have a
> >> few in the translator stuff that I need to tidy up.
> >>
> >> Hen
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> See JIRA :)
> >>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=1
> 2310481&fixfor=12311714&resolution=-
> 1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> See title.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Matt
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message