Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43538 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 07:32:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 07:32:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 73621 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 07:32:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 73047 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 07:32:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 73019 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2010 07:32:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 07:32:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of GGregory@seagullsoftware.com designates 216.82.250.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.82.250.51] (HELO mail108.messagelabs.com) (216.82.250.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 07:32:29 +0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: GGregory@seagullsoftware.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-108.messagelabs.com!1289201525!50154152!2 X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.9; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [137.134.240.188] Received: (qmail 17739 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 07:32:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO postal.rocketsoftware.com) (137.134.240.188) by server-4.tower-108.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 07:32:07 -0000 Received: from NWT-S-MBX2.rocketsoftware.com ([fe80::5161:f503:4728:78ad]) by nwt-s-cas1.rocketsoftware.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0255.000; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 02:32:02 -0500 From: Gary Gregory To: Commons Developers List Subject: RE: Backwards incompatible changes and package names (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons VFS 2.0) Thread-Topic: Backwards incompatible changes and package names (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons VFS 2.0) Thread-Index: AQHLfsf9okNiESOV7EmUJSgFZ3fUW5NnBRWAgAAB0gCAAAQWgIAAETQAgAAMFoCAAAMNAP//7vIw Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 07:32:01 +0000 Message-ID: <02AA127CD8DCDE48BC7D2DFB6C87083A07DCC622@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware.com> References: <4CD741A9.8050803@gmail.com> <4CD75A3B.6000104@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.10.252] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 > -----Original Message----- > From: jcarman@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcarman@carmanconsulting.com] = On > Behalf Of James Carman > Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 18:14 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: Backwards incompatible changes and package names (was: Re: [= VOTE] > Release Commons VFS 2.0) >=20 > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Phil Steitz wrote= : > > I would not -1 the release, but I would encourage the RM to consider ma= king > > it 1.x if there are no compat breaks. > > >=20 > So, how about now that we know there are compat breaks? I would -1 > the release now that we know the API is in fact "broken" between 1 and > 2 and they're not doing the package/artifactId change (barring any > justification why we think it's okay). Well, that should settle it. API-breakage -> new major version -> package/a= rtifactId change. So we can take this RC, do the above changes, then keep move on to a Java 5= themed release for 2.1. Gary=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org