From dev-return-122078-apmail-commons-dev-archive=commons.apache.org@commons.apache.org Thu Nov 04 13:15:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 14934 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 13:15:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 13:15:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 30838 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 13:16:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 30662 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 13:16:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 30654 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2010 13:16:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 13:16:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jak-commons-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.12 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.12] (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 13:16:09 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDzfN-0007aD-Ek for dev@commons.apache.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:15:45 +0100 Received: from mail.elsag-solutions.com ([62.154.225.82]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:15:45 +0100 Received: from joerg.schaible by mail.elsag-solutions.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:15:45 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@commons.apache.org From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmc=?= Schaible Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons VFS 2.0 Followup-To: gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:15:33 +0100 Lines: 51 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: mail.elsag-solutions.com User-Agent: KNode/4.4.5 Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Ralph, > > Ralph Goers wrote: > >> This is a vote to release Apache Commons VFS 2.0. >> >> [ ] +1 release it >> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care >> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because... > > Minor nitpicks: > > 1/ commons-vfs-parent.pom declares own snapshot repositories. Is it still > necessary? Such declarations are not recommended by Maven folks anyway. > 2/ commons-vfs.pom contains a comment that the TestSuites are not > executed. This is no longer true for the version of the used surefire > plugin. > 3/ http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/commons-vfs/download.html: > Something went wrong with the table. > 4/ This page recommends also Maven 2.1.0 to build although this version is > considered as broken. Either recommend 2.0.11 (building with JDK 1.4) or > >= 2.2.1. > 5/ The table on this page lists httpclient 2.0, but we use 3.0. Bascially > we could also provide links to the generated dependency pages of the > submodules. The page also contains a link to "nightly builds" with 3 year old artifacts. > 6/ The dependency report of the core module declares httpclient as > required. The dependency report of the sandbox declares the core vfs as > required, but httpclient as optional. Either it's optional in core or > required in the sandbox. > 7/ New FTPS support is not even mentioned on > http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/commons-vfs/filesystems.html as > enhancement of FTP provider (see VFS-264). > 8/ The same page lists mime FS twice (as supported FS and available from > sandbox, while CIFS support is listed only once). Both should be handled > the same. > 9/ http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/commons-vfs/3rdparty.html lists loopy > as external plugin. While it is not clear that it still works with VFS > 2.0, there are more providers listed in the Wiki (icnl. Loopy): > http://wiki.apache.org/commons/VFS. Maybe it is better to drop the page > completely, create an own section in the Wiki for 3rd party plugins and > have a link to this Wiki page from > http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/commons- vfs/filesystems.html. The news paragraph in commons-vfs home is outdated. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org