commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Accept the package name/artifactId guideline as a "rule"...
Date Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:38:17 GMT
Luc Maisonobe wrote:

> Le 24/11/2010 20:43, James Carman a écrit :
>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Ralph Goers
>> <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I disagree. The "rule" should be that a new package and artifactId is
>>> required when compatibility is broken, not when a version change occurs.
>>> Exceptions should be based on that policy, not on a version change
>>> occurs.
>>>
>> 
>> Ok, so how about we change the rule?  We could say "if the binary
>> compatibility is broken, then the package/artifactId must change."
> 
> +1 for the rule as stated here.

+1

- Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message