commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Carman <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Commons VFS 2.0
Date Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:35:02 GMT
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Ralph Goers <> wrote:
> Do you really consider this to be a -1?  I consider this to be a documentation issue.
 User's can pick and choose which providers they want and simply need to be aware that Net
2.0 requires 1.5.

The providers are auto-registered based on what's on the classpath.
So, if they added net 2.0 to their classpath, that provider would be
registered.  It may not be completely obvious that net 2.0 requires
1.5+.  I agree this is probably just a documentation issue.  Don't
know if it should be a blocker.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message