commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Commons VFS 2.0
Date Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:04:54 GMT
On 5 November 2010 20:00, James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>
>> Simply bumping the JDK requirement is enough to go from 1.x to 2.x IMO.
>>
>
> Again, I'm going to harp on the consistency factor.  If we go to 2.0
> without changing artifactId and package, then future releases will be
> inconsistent.  See other threads about this discussion, as I do not
> wish to re-hash it yet again.  For this release, since it's binary
> compatible, we can leave it at 1.1 to avoid introducing an
> inconsistency.  Others have argued that merely bumping JDK versions
> isn't necessarily a reason to go to a new major version.

I just don't think the need for consistency has been agreed.

I suggest you create a Wiki with the arguments so far (as I have
started for Maven groupId)

+1 to using 2.0 for this release, without requiring package or groupId changes.

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message