commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Accept the package name/artifactId guideline as a "rule"...
Date Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:03:13 GMT

On Nov 24, 2010, at 7:36 AM, James Carman wrote:

> We've had this package name/artifactId change discussion numerous
> times and I think it's time we put this thing to a vote.  What I
> propose is that we say that this is a rule and in order to "break"
> that rule, you have to provide strong evidence that the component's
> situation is unique and not affected by the issues that this rule
> tries to address.  This is to avoid re-hashing this argument all the
> time.  If a component wants to break the rule, then they should think
> through the arguments (read the Wiki page first) and carefully
> consider why they feel they are unique and unaffected by the issues.
> So, here's the rule:
> 
> A major version change requires that you change the package name (the
> part that comes after org.apache.commons) and the Maven artifactId to
> the component's name with the major version appended to the end.
> 
> [ ] +1 - accept this as a rule
> [ ] -1 - do not accept this as a rule
> 

-1 for the same reasons stated by Stephen and sebb.  If this was changed to be based on binary
compatibility breakage I would vote +1.

Ralph


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message