commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Accept the package name/artifactId guideline as a "rule"...
Date Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:37:13 GMT
Am 24.11.2010 21:17, schrieb Luc Maisonobe:
> Le 24/11/2010 20:43, James Carman a écrit :
>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Ralph Goers
>> <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> I disagree. The "rule" should be that a new package and artifactId is required
when compatibility is broken, not when a version change occurs. Exceptions should be based
on that policy, not on a version change occurs.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, so how about we change the rule?  We could say "if the binary
>> compatibility is broken, then the package/artifactId must change."
>
> +1 for the rule as stated here.
>
> Luc

+1 I would also sign this.

Oliver

>
>> Again, this rule can be broken if a component feels they need to do so
>> and they provide a very good reason. :)
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message