commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <GGreg...@seagullsoftware.com>
Subject RE: Release distribution contents.
Date Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:49:33 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.goers@dslextreme.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 07:12
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Release distribution contents.
> 
> It would be good to have a definitive position on this. 

IMO, it would be even good-er to have a [commons]-wide position on this.

G

The VFS build includes
> the javadoc and source jars in the distribution zip, even though there is a
> separate source distribution zip (the source distribution is complete while
> the source jar is only suitable for use by an IDE). I'm close to doing another
> release attempt and would like to know if I need to change that before I do
> it.
> 
> Ralph
> 
> 
> On Nov 18, 2010, at 3:37 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> 
> > On 11/18/10 5:04 AM, sebb wrote:
> >> On 18 November 2010 07:22, Oliver Heger<oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de>
> wrote:
> >>> Build works fine with JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Artifacts look good.
> >>>
> >>> The only nitpick I found is that the binary distribution does not contain
> >>> the source and Javadocs jar.
> >>
> >> That's deliberate.
> >>
> >> It contains the Javadocs as individual files, so including the javadoc
> >> jar is just wasted space, and if users want the source they can
> >> download the source archive.
> >>
> >> As far as I was aware, the source and javadocs jars are intended for
> >> Maven distribution only
> >
> >
> > Personally I am fine not including these jars; but IIUC the reason people
> started including them a couple of years back was to make it easier for users
> using IDEs that make use of them.
> >
> > Not voting yet because I have not tested the release yet.
> >
> > Phil
> >>
> >>> So +1.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >>> Oliver
> >>>
> >>> Am 17.11.2010 02:27, schrieb sebb:
> >>>>
> >>>> This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3.
> >>>>
> >>>> Changes since RC1 are:
> >>>> - drop unnecessary jars from binary archive
> >>>> - include RELEASE-NOTES in binary and source archives
> >>>>
> >>>> [ ] +1 release it
> >>>> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
> >>>> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because...
> >>>>
> >>>> tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_2_RC3/
> >>>>
> >>>> site: http://people.apache.org/~sebb/NET_2_2_RC3/
> >>>>
> >>>> Archives (Maven and non-Maven) have been uploaded to:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-011/
> >>>>
> >>>> Vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message