commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <GGreg...@seagullsoftware.com>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Release Commons VFS 2.0
Date Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:54:19 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.goers@dslextreme.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 09:52
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons VFS 2.0
> 
> 
> On Nov 5, 2010, at 9:36 AM, James Carman wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schaible@gmx.de>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> As alternative: Can't we simply raise the minimum JDK level for VFS to 1.5
> >> also?
> >>
> >
> > +1!  Quit living in the past.  Of course, we then have to discuss the
> > package name (and thus artifact id) change. :)
> >
> 
> It seems we had that discussion before and agreed it was OK to jump to Java 5.
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org/msg11705.html. I guess it
> was never formally done.  I had planned on doing some refactoring that I quess
> I never got around to.
> 
> Note that the minimum version for 1.0 was 1.3. Whoever started 2.0 changed the
> minimum version to 1.4.
> 
> If package names change it will require a bit of work.  I'm not sure there is
> anyone using 1.0. All the questions on the dev list have been for 2.0 for
> quite some time.

FYI: We've been shipping with 1.0 for a long time and plan on upgrading to 2.0. We require
Java 6 for all our Java apps.

Gary

> 
> Ralph
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message