Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25343 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2010 16:58:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2010 16:58:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 61639 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 16:58:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 61509 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 16:58:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 61501 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2010 16:58:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:58:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of simone.tripodi@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.49] (HELO mail-ww0-f49.google.com) (74.125.82.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:58:49 +0000 Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so3694903wwb.6 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:58:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EcEyBo18ZIX8KQexfrw6CRZg7XMsXodq/9M75YB19Ig=; b=QwZxe7JBlecjH1oqGe8klNIqXNouLcDLQISrACYGc332kmhIdtsDjt5x1eAChb7XKY NJuZwEDn3LTOcIINKfWhWRl7Dwd1SFrzCpj44oIwq5poSkvYit3rfrljSXc3PrDCG9lR Aoe6miAmHd60x3aX545x4q3ww+4UFFeUJrE9w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=dcwqFPdMMZAZ9jg9HD4uVln83YtydQrw0KwTYSgY+AhTh2wAd2/Zgcz1MNE6NWoXUB YUDRYEiixdIIrDNLNWRwUZKaSyNfBxcxr/W+ndJAfJXxPWQ7ZDXujht2YsbcJhVtVGT4 wip6p3kJtiLwWFMlaFIOUTXH5XqSsyCXu3kzM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.165.77 with SMTP id d55mr7807929wel.23.1288457908197; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.50.142 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:58:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <05D2C290-D073-47FA-A2FC-A133256A568C@seagullsoftware.com> References: <02AA127CD8DCDE48BC7D2DFB6C87083A07DB70FB@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware.com> <02AA127CD8DCDE48BC7D2DFB6C87083A07DB7A4E@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware.com> <02AA127CD8DCDE48BC7D2DFB6C87083A07DB7D37@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware.com> <02AA127CD8DCDE48BC7D2DFB6C87083A07DB8542@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware.com> <02AA127CD8DCDE48BC7D2DFB6C87083A07DB8A48@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware.com> <4CC59DF6.6000001@gmail.com> <4CC5A3A0.8070501@gmail.com> <4CC5AF6D.1040300@gmail.com> <4CC5B395.2000602@gmail.com> <02AA127CD8DCDE48BC7D2DFB6C87083A07DC2256@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware.com> <02AA127CD8DCDE48BC7D2DFB6C87083A07DC23D8@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware.com> <02AA127CD8DCDE48BC7D2DFB6C87083A07DC3059@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware.com> <05D2C290-D073-47FA-A2FC-A133256A568C@seagullsoftware.com> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:58:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [pool] Common behavior for BOP and BKOP From: Simone Tripodi To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Gary, yes, understood and agreed :) Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Oct 30, 2010, at 13:01, "Simone Tripodi" wrote: > >> HiGary, >> I agree on your point of view, I wonder if we can even create abstract >> classes for common settings to avoid redundancies, I don't know if it >> could make sense. >> Have a nice day! > > I'm just taking it one strop at a time here to avoid creating a big bang diff file (as I did for a previous pool topic) So I am curious to see if it is ok for most folk. > > Gary > >> Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Gary Gregory >> wrote: >>> In [POOL-178] I have created a patch that IMO should make it easier for us to further refactor code. >>> >>> >>> >>> In brief, OP/BOP and KOP/BKOP do not have a common parent interface/class. This patch remedies this by pulling up the close/clear/getNumActive/getNumIdle methods into a new interface and class. >>> >>> >>> >>> This seems not very controversial (to me at least), so I would like to commit it (unless riots spread from Paris to this list.) >>> >>> >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> >>> >>> [POOL-178] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-178 >>> >>> >>> >>> Gary Gregory >>> >>> Senior Software Engineer >>> >>> Rocket Software >>> >>> 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 * Atlanta, GA 30326 * USA >>> >>> Tel: +1.404.760.1560 >>> >>> Email: ggregory@seagullsoftware.com >>> >>> Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org