Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jcarman@carmanconsulting.com
In-Reply-To: <4CB8CA05.8060308@apache.org>
References: <AANLkTi=yyqwtrh1Zc5nh+Qdu7omtGmEmm3Kk0Ww9WnQp@mail.gmail.com>
 <EE6384FB-9614-44FB-A553-1E3E57904E36@gmail.com>
 <AANLkTik5r8hF4pe_oDTdVF64RrbH9m1kCejfevOZvccs@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTi=GFT52Aub4jRsSdP3jfPOCqPFOSDJGAVC0mPSk@mail.gmail.com>
 <4CB8CA05.8060308@apache.org>
From: James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:28:32 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTikRO+Bxe_Wu58mf8GRnCALpxu=ojo2VaRCtw2aL@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [pool] time to move groupId?
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I didn't say it was required.  I said it was a good idea, because it
would keep things consistent.

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Dennis Lundberg <dennisl@apache.org> wrote=
:
> Changing the artifactId is not necessary. At least if we predict that we
> will not change the groupId again. In Maven the combination of groupId,
> artifactId and version is unique. So org.apache.commons:commons-pool:2.0
> and org.apache.commons:commons-pool:3.0 are two unique artifacts.
>
> On 2010-10-15 20:43, James Carman wrote:
>> If we do change the package name to pool2, then I'd suggest the
>> artifact id change too so that everything stays consistent. =A0So, the
>> new artifact id would be commons-pool2 rather than commons-pool.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:40 PM, James Carman
>> <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>>> If you change the group id, it's probably best to go ahead and change
>>> the package names also, in case two versions show up on the same
>>> classpath. =A0Maven won't know that org.apache.commons:common-pool is
>>> the same as commons-pool:commons-pool, so it would potentially put
>>> both on the classpath. =A0I believe there are also binary compatibility
>>> issues (hence the 2.0), so changing that would mean we'd want to
>>> change it also.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wr=
ote:
>>>> +1 for 2.0. =A0We should also talk about the ugliness that we should p=
robably also do for 2.0: o.a.c.pool2 or somesuch.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 15, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Simone Tripodi <simone.tripodi@gmail.com=
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all mates,
>>>>> is this the right time to move the pool grouId to org.apache.commons?
>>>>> Many thanks in advance,
>>>>> Simo
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dennis Lundberg
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org