Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41080 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2010 21:55:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Oct 2010 21:55:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 38231 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2010 21:55:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 38110 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2010 21:55:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 38102 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2010 21:55:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 21:55:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.171] (HELO mail-gx0-f171.google.com) (209.85.161.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 21:55:24 +0000 Received: by gxk6 with SMTP id 6so1528491gxk.30 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:55:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Jj6xnbgPNDqlcnoAnDg7H7qqXfaFC5ZIKyofDLUVEHg=; b=Bj48X5Kc93KSynLbX8u5eiGh+Sv85DFthAISoOd107VcMJZu41MjV6wYFZog9B74SX i7KiW2tizbq5zZuD+GUbIOl5pihXfVpaRHPCYeYADVOn0fiAe4y6MIxMEb0JSo3iGJUp rien3YgHT0omRXwnP0JdVmcFlc2puCpyt2JmM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=x8IXiDBqSeUiuvF3LoYAOhPCc7BKFJO3RLc7HmG4gCSqk4TVZN0V5VL7E0YUevMCG4 CdhQWFzckL/1Jk/kXKgwmYE9nuoQdkLqqPPrYbjAa03Hi6UrINwvDsJPIpWV+vlBL5mE B95cvtbt/WfQFVmEAPmc3kl9WUxE9P+2K5z/Q= Received: by 10.220.30.143 with SMTP id u15mr1532905vcc.12.1285970103702; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:55:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.179.195 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:54:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101001212344.GB31226@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> References: <20101001133549.692DE23889EB@eris.apache.org> <20101001134911.GF12035@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> <20101001142705.GG12035@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> <20101001212344.GB31226@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:54:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Math] Code review To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002354477e0039135d0491953f1f --002354477e0039135d0491953f1f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 In Mahout, we have found that IntelliJ (which is usually like Eclipse, but more thorough) does not warn on the same things that findbugs, pmd or checkstyle warn on. We haven't been able to force that behavior very well, either. That means that we have to use a combination of methods to drive down warnings. In general, the quality of the maven mediated warnings is much lower than the quality of the IDE based warnings although there are a few exceptions (Eclipse flags @override all the time even when it is correctly done, findbugs flags certain serialization and maintainability problems better). On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Gilles Sadowski < gilles@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > This, I know. In fact I was surprised that Sebb uncovered so many problems > that were _not_ reported by FindBugs or Checkstyle. Hence my question: Can > there be additional Maven plugins that will report all the things which > Eclipse sees? > --002354477e0039135d0491953f1f--