commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject Re: [pool] time to move groupId?
Date Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:58:03 GMT
Well we've had a discussion very similar to this before.

http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org/msg15748.html
On Oct 16, 2010 6:48 AM, "Simone Tripodi" <simone.tripodi@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm personally more with Dennis' opinion, but that's just mine idea.
>
> Question to fill the lack of my knowledge: which is the apache way
> when not everybody agrees with one opinion and an important decision -
> like this - has to be taken?
>
> Many thanks in advance, have a nice day,
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schaible@gmx.de>
wrote:
>> James Carman wrote:
>>
>>> If you change the group id, it's probably best to go ahead and change
>>> the package names also, in case two versions show up on the same
>>> classpath.  Maven won't know that org.apache.commons:common-pool is
>>> the same as commons-pool:commons-pool, so it would potentially put
>>> both on the classpath.  I believe there are also binary compatibility
>>> issues (hence the 2.0), so changing that would mean we'd want to
>>> change it also.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> - Jörg
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message