commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject Re: [pool] time to move groupId?
Date Sat, 16 Oct 2010 11:40:29 GMT
I don't think the package/artifact id idea had come about just yet at that
point in Lang's life
On Oct 16, 2010 7:26 AM, "Simone Tripodi" <simone.tripodi@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi James,
> thanks for the link :)
> I'm for consistency too, so even if I'm no to so enthusiast, and since
> Lang3 created a precedent, the new pom metadata will be:
>
> groupId: org.apache.commons
> artifactId: commons-pool2
> version: 2.0
> package: org.apache.commons.pool2
>
> I take in charge to perform this migration ASAP if someone else is not
> already working on it, just let me know.
>
> BTW I'd like to know also how did you solve the same question for lang
> -> lang2, just to complete my knowledge, many thanks in advance.
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:58 PM, James Carman
> <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>> Well we've had a discussion very similar to this before.
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org/msg15748.html
>> On Oct 16, 2010 6:48 AM, "Simone Tripodi" <simone.tripodi@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I'm personally more with Dennis' opinion, but that's just mine idea.
>>>
>>> Question to fill the lack of my knowledge: which is the apache way
>>> when not everybody agrees with one opinion and an important decision -
>>> like this - has to be taken?
>>>
>>> Many thanks in advance, have a nice day,
>>> Simo
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schaible@gmx.de>
>> wrote:
>>>> James Carman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If you change the group id, it's probably best to go ahead and change
>>>>> the package names also, in case two versions show up on the same
>>>>> classpath.  Maven won't know that org.apache.commons:common-pool is
>>>>> the same as commons-pool:commons-pool, so it would potentially put
>>>>> both on the classpath.  I believe there are also binary compatibility
>>>>> issues (hence the 2.0), so changing that would mean we'd want to
>>>>> change it also.
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> - Jörg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message