commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <>
Subject Re: [pool] runtime re-configuration
Date Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:30:18 GMT
Good point James, thanks for the feedback! I suppose that's the reason
why previous maintainers let the fields protected to access them
directly, that will be replaced by setters/getters methods.

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:18 PM, James Carman
<> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Simone Tripodi
> <> wrote:
>> Hi Phil! :)
>> honestly I didn't understand which are the use cases when a pool needs
>> to be reconfigured, that's why I've always used the pool in "configure
>> and use" modality and Seb's suggestion sounded good to me. OTOH I
>> didn't modify any single code line before hearing your thoughts since
>> you know much more than me.
>> If pool's property are mutable, so I need to add the setters, make
>> them final otherwise :P
> What if you want to alter the way the pool works at runtime?  Perhaps
> you're seeing that it keeps causing long waits because you're not
> allowing it to grow big enough?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message