Hi all,
I'm personally more with Dennis' opinion, but that's just mine idea.
Question to fill the lack of my knowledge: which is the apache way
when not everybody agrees with one opinion and an important decision -
like this - has to be taken?
Many thanks in advance, have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schaible@gmx.de> wrote:
> James Carman wrote:
>
>> If you change the group id, it's probably best to go ahead and change
>> the package names also, in case two versions show up on the same
>> classpath. Maven won't know that org.apache.commons:common-pool is
>> the same as commons-pool:commons-pool, so it would potentially put
>> both on the classpath. I believe there are also binary compatibility
>> issues (hence the 2.0), so changing that would mean we'd want to
>> change it also.
>
> +1
>
> - Jörg
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
|