Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gudnabrsam@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.160.171 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        b=B+O5YlkYq4llQMqFFVXLxzbhK+Oc51nfzH5N2Nb/ZJmAUx6zAM1PZL2ofMEVrDPlQM
         EfXmsG8QZYTEFZkOqhppjaiLjB1tKxpj8NOC8hOilhyKhygDdj8RxtIS01kz6wUMXfde
         KQ/7lXiAVlLXus6kYwItruiHVAW7YZZK4KmPg=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Subject: Re: [proxy] suppression of equals/hashCode
From: Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <i79mhb$11k$1@dough.gmane.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:18:47 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9FA57796-A037-4FF3-8F18-195693987BA0@gmail.com>
References: <29E08A68-B784-42FB-95D4-7CE12C293AF8@gmail.com>
 <AANLkTi=G_ydeJGYgVTwtQOX0GfOqV5OOn3ae9UZTL0m_@mail.gmail.com>
 <6F3F9813-98A2-451F-B663-379E5B46A21F@gmail.com>
 <AANLkTinrfih3S0Bn-egco8UqhdFhZwgTUi7GxdbxsRdu@mail.gmail.com>
 <1A6A2EE3-90A3-4F51-B336-7CBA7493388B@gmail.com>
 <i79mhb$11k$1@dough.gmane.org>
To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>


On Sep 21, 2010, at 2:23 AM, J=F6rg Schaible wrote:

> Hi Matt and James,
>=20
> Matt Benson wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>> On Sep 20, 2010, at 6:11 PM, James Carman wrote:
>>=20
>>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>> This would seem quite complicated to execute, would it not?
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> What do you propose?
>>>=20
>>=20
>> I don't know for sure yet.  My initial reaction would have been to =
try and
>> consolidate the current handling somehow down to =
AbstractProxyFactory,
>> then control whether proxies used the default behavior with a simple
>> boolean property.  This would therefore be what it is today:  a =
detail of
>> the existing ProxyFactory implementations.
>=20
> the standard invoker in ProxyToys does simply call the methods of the=20=

> proxied objects. However, it depends on the actual proxy type, if this=20=

> default is replaced with something else (e.g. all delegating proxies =
will=20
> handle equal and hashCode differently).
>=20
> Bottom line is that it depends on the proxies' purpose, but it is not=20=

> configurable. You have to create a new proxy type to overwrite the =
proxies'=20
> standard behavior.
>=20

I had just had that thought this morning:  that in particular, only a =
delegating type proxy, an Interceptor proxy in [proxy] speak, would be =
subject to the condition James outline where an interceptor proxy and =
its target should *not* be considered equal.  Thanks for weighing in =
here, Joerg...

> - J=F6rg
>=20
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>=20


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org