Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83590 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2010 14:25:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Sep 2010 14:25:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 37548 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2010 14:25:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 37461 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2010 14:25:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 37453 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2010 14:25:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:25:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.74.71.26] (HELO hel.is.scarlet.be) (193.74.71.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:25:44 +0000 Received: from mail.harfang.homelinux.org (ip-213-49-249-62.dsl.scarlet.be [213.49.249.62]) by hel.is.scarlet.be (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o8SEPMsb009414 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:25:22 +0200 Received: from localhost (mail.harfang.homelinux.org [192.168.20.11]) by mail.harfang.homelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F133E61CBD for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:25:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.harfang.homelinux.org ([192.168.20.11]) by localhost (mail.harfang.homelinux.org [192.168.20.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K-S1IMpdcQ4w for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:25:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dusk.harfang.homelinux.org (mail.harfang.homelinux.org [192.168.20.11]) by mail.harfang.homelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2903961803 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:25:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eran by dusk.harfang.homelinux.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P0b7P-0005X5-Qe for dev@commons.apache.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:25:19 +0200 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:25:18 +0200 From: Gilles Sadowski To: dev@commons.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r1002145 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/math/distribution/ test/java/org/apache/commons/math/distribution/ Message-ID: <20100928142518.GP12035@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: dev@commons.apache.org References: <20100928123810.2A7ED2388999@eris.apache.org> <4CA1EEA7.3080004@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CA1EEA7.3080004@free.fr> X-Operating-System: Tiny Tux X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: 53B9 972E C2E6 B93C BEAD 7092 09E6 AF46 51D0 5641 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-DCC-scarlet.be-Metrics: hel 20002; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 > > It seems some recent changes break compilation. Not in this specific > set, but probably one of the previous ones from today or yesterday. Break compilation? "mvn clean site" produces a "BUILD SUCCESSFUL" here. > The problems are some @Override annotations in BetaDistributionImpl > (getAlpha, getBeta), GammaDistributionImpl (getalpha, getBeta) and > ExponentialDistributionImpl (getMean). They directly implement > interfaces and do not extend a superclass, so the Override annotation > generates an error (at least on Eclipse). So, does that mean that Eclipse refuses to compile because of annotations? Seems a bug in Eclipse... Is it the expected behaviour that "@Override" only means "overrides a method in a class but not in an interface"? [Anyway, I'll try and remove the annotations in all those problematic cases. I thought I was being nice in putting them :-}.] Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org