commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <>
Subject Re: [infra] site deploying
Date Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:41:25 GMT
Hi all guys,
sorry I'm late but I took yesterday to rest a little. That's exactly
the point of my question in my first message, so I approached the
problem using the Antonio's suggestion, since that part was missing on
the wiki page or the link Phil pointed. If you explain me what the
procedure is, I'm more then pleased to fix the new site and add the
missing doc on the wiki.
Many thanks in advance, have a nice day!

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Rahul Akolkar <> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:54 AM, sebb <> wrote:
>> On 26 September 2010 06:30, Rahul Akolkar <> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Simone Tripodi
>>> <> wrote:
>>>> Thanks both Antonio and Phil :)
>>>> @Phil: absolutely right, but that concerns the main site, what I was
>>>> worried about is the 2.1 specific release site. I already deployed the
>>>> 2.2 site, you can see them on
>>>> It seems everything looks good, btw if you couls send some feedback
>>>> after a quick review it would be much more than appreciated, thanks in
>>>> advance!!!
>>> <snip/>
>>> Given the way the site menu works, there are now a number of broken links.
>>> The 2.1 guide should actually be part of the deployed site so the
>>> menus continue to work. Now that we have a more elaborate guide (in
>>> terms of number of site pages), perhaps we should just pull specific
>>> release guides in via svn externals.
>> Not sure how that would work, as the generated documention is not in SVN?
> <snip/>
> By pulling in the guide xdoc for a release from the release tag --
> will try such a setup for the site when I get a chance.
> -Rahul
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message