commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Xun Long Gui <ustbco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [scxml-eclipse] User Feedback
Date Sun, 05 Sep 2010 10:02:22 GMT
Yeah, I will add this part, but i think it will take me a while, i will
graduate this winter, these days, i was working for my graduate pater, so
may be you should wait for a while, sorry for that :-(

2010/9/5 Jacob Beard <jbeard4@cs.mcgill.ca>

> Hi Long,
>
> I just wanted to follow up quickly and find out the current status on the
> issues that were raised here. Specifically, is it possible to add
> executable
> content to transitions in scxml-eclipse?
>
> Please let me know. Thanks,
>
> Jake
>
> 2010/8/8 Jacob Beard <jbeard4@cs.mcgill.ca>
>
> > Hi Long,
> >
> > I should mention that I had missed this part of the specification as
> > well, and I only recently discovered it while trying to determine how
> > best to express static reactions with SCXML. I'm currently updating
> > scxml-js to support this.
> >
> > Jake
> >
> > On 10-08-08 10:12 PM, Xun Long Gui wrote:
> > > Hi Jake,
> > > Thanks for your reply. It seems that we should re-define transition EMF
> > data
> > > model for this tool, rebuild the tool from the base. I will read SCXML
> > > transition specification carefully and carry on the rebuild job
> > >
> > > 在 2010年8月9日 上午9:22,Jacob Beard <jbeard4@cs.mcgill.ca>写道:
> > >
> > >
> > >> Hi, Long,
> > >>
> > >> Replies below:
> > >>
> > >> On 10-08-08 09:06 PM, Xun Long Gui wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I do not think we can create a transition without a target, target
is
> a
> > >>> necessary element for a transition.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> The spec says that the target attribute on transition is not required.
> > >> In that case, I think the semantics are similar to a Static Reaction,
> as
> > >> defined in the paper describing the Rhapsody semantics of statecharts.
> > >> From the spec:
> > >>
> > >> The identifier(s) of the state or parallel region to transition to. If
> > >> it is omitted, the transition will not cause a change in the state
> > >> configuration when it is executed. The executable content contained in
> > >> the transition will still be executed, so the transition will function
> > >> as a simple event handler. If the target is present and equal to the
> > >> state containing the transition element, the transition will cause the
> > >> state machine to leave and then re-enter this state.
> > >>
> > >> From: http://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/#transition
> > >>
> > >>> To feature 1 and 3 in Chris's commends, we can achieve them, not a
> big
> > >>> thing. What do you mean about "showstoppers" bug ?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> What I mean is that I think these things are critical to usability.
> > >>
> > >> Jake
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Best Regards

Gui Xun Long (桂训龙)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message