commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Xun Long Gui <ustbco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [scxml-eclipse] User Feedback
Date Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:15:00 GMT
Yeah, i hope some one can work with me for the project together, i will
supply anything that you need as i can :-)

在 2010年9月5日 下午10:19,Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com>写道:

> 2010/9/5 Xun Long Gui <ustbcoder@gmail.com>:
> > Yeah, I will add this part, but i think it will take me a while, i will
> > graduate this winter, these days, i was working for my graduate pater, so
> > may be you should wait for a while, sorry for that :-(
> >
> <snip/>
>
> The other option always available would be for someone else to jump in
> and make the necessary changes. I may not have time soon for this, but
> Jake or Chris if you want to take a look, feel free to have at it.
>
> Starting point to get going is probably this page [1].
>
> -Rahul
>
> [1]
> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/gsoc/2010/scxml-eclipse/guide/run-source-code.html
>
>
>
> > 2010/9/5 Jacob Beard <jbeard4@cs.mcgill.ca>
> >
> >> Hi Long,
> >>
> >> I just wanted to follow up quickly and find out the current status on
> the
> >> issues that were raised here. Specifically, is it possible to add
> >> executable
> >> content to transitions in scxml-eclipse?
> >>
> >> Please let me know. Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jake
> >>
> >> 2010/8/8 Jacob Beard <jbeard4@cs.mcgill.ca>
> >>
> >> > Hi Long,
> >> >
> >> > I should mention that I had missed this part of the specification as
> >> > well, and I only recently discovered it while trying to determine how
> >> > best to express static reactions with SCXML. I'm currently updating
> >> > scxml-js to support this.
> >> >
> >> > Jake
> >> >
> >> > On 10-08-08 10:12 PM, Xun Long Gui wrote:
> >> > > Hi Jake,
> >> > > Thanks for your reply. It seems that we should re-define transition
> EMF
> >> > data
> >> > > model for this tool, rebuild the tool from the base. I will read
> SCXML
> >> > > transition specification carefully and carry on the rebuild job
> >> > >
> >> > > 在 2010年8月9日 上午9:22,Jacob Beard <jbeard4@cs.mcgill.ca>写道:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >> Hi, Long,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Replies below:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On 10-08-08 09:06 PM, Xun Long Gui wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> I do not think we can create a transition without a target,
target
> is
> >> a
> >> > >>> necessary element for a transition.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >> The spec says that the target attribute on transition is not
> required.
> >> > >> In that case, I think the semantics are similar to a Static
> Reaction,
> >> as
> >> > >> defined in the paper describing the Rhapsody semantics of
> statecharts.
> >> > >> From the spec:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> The identifier(s) of the state or parallel region to transition
to.
> If
> >> > >> it is omitted, the transition will not cause a change in the state
> >> > >> configuration when it is executed. The executable content contained
> in
> >> > >> the transition will still be executed, so the transition will
> function
> >> > >> as a simple event handler. If the target is present and equal
to
> the
> >> > >> state containing the transition element, the transition will cause
> the
> >> > >> state machine to leave and then re-enter this state.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> From: http://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/#transition
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> To feature 1 and 3 in Chris's commends, we can achieve them,
not a
> >> big
> >> > >>> thing. What do you mean about "showstoppers" bug ?
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >> What I mean is that I think these things are critical to usability.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Jake
> >> > >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Best Regards

Gui Xun Long (桂训龙)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message