Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-120732-apmail-commons-dev-archive=commons.apache.org@commons.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 62032 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2010 13:22:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2010 13:22:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 42655 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 13:22:56 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org
Received: (qmail 42341 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 13:22:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@commons.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@commons.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.commons.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org
Received: (qmail 42333 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2010 13:22:53 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:22:53 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rahul.akolkar@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.82.171] (HELO mail-wy0-f171.google.com) (74.125.82.171)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:22:47 +0000
Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so2713157wya.30
        for <dev@commons.apache.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=SfvazVRoKxBU5Y9w5dgyOx/vr1b8Tbp29ZlvV1L8O/s=;
        b=H02kDpBylpsgZ2sMJPyRi/l1Fxp0qHiDAXG19mbqvmGsYFoBp0C8rhk5n8dLV9J+Sk
         u6wlMkT1ZjEgt9ztV4HBWZe+5dsl9zj8XApJwpXXuxve60m+fgEnDoxKSxqwBTpzirVr
         7atTUZE8XlBbYWjQxbIxAlp2Fn4OLF7NN32eM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=N3+p0dsps5ZkXxZaja0ZIowpW+z33vcYISBlwkBFIZobV8HH/PU8UJvH6aztFXp30F
         Q4jR96D8OZDfhsiIVJrqvR2C9ofHlHM/ND34j06+UjiNqYcCOeZ8wMBtkbik6imZL0c+
         sEBt7hYXnREH+wacEiLs5hE+PN4vX5jbTxvXo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.141.84 with SMTP id l20mr4980841wbu.119.1283174545728;
 Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.133.84 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87y6boa3c9.fsf@v35516.1blu.de>
References: <20100816112253.44F9115D3BA@vmgump.apache.org>
	<4C699406.4060904@oliver-heger.de>
	<877hjqfhpp.fsf@v35516.1blu.de>
	<4C699A58.3060107@oliver-heger.de>
	<AANLkTikzUH5OJF+RasxM3niXnMXZxf5JudxnkfHKWAFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ocd2e0t5.fsf_-_@v35516.1blu.de>
	<AANLkTimO87UW=BReHh-nEgLpretF2now_yTHKKd25FTd@mail.gmail.com>
	<87wrrpfcx1.fsf@v35516.1blu.de>
	<AANLkTinu-+0oYPA1BRtJ0pT6hvfePgjRq1o4soJa+k80@mail.gmail.com>
	<87bp91f3ei.fsf@v35516.1blu.de>
	<AANLkTin9HGQijK0qWFuX=MO+UU6mwByT=B3q=mdp1gjU@mail.gmail.com>
	<87y6boa3c9.fsf@v35516.1blu.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:22:25 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTikO5HaappS2WrvTP+pBaHsXLcFMe7PohTJ2_UvK@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: scxml test failures in Gump
From: Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2010-08-27, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
>> It'd be great if you or anyone else with access to vmgump could try a
>> 'mvn test' on a fresh scxml trunk checkout and see if we get the same
>> 2 failures.
>
> No, that works just fine.
>
<snip/>

Good to know.


>> Since this was never passing in a gump run, I'd like to get that
>> baseline before I investigate. TIA.
>
> I think I've identified the culprit, but not the real reason. =A0If I do =
a
> clean build of scxml with an empty local repository and then replace
> commons-el-1.0.jar with a trunk build of commons-el I get the exact same
> two failures you see in Gump.
>
> So there is some change in commons-el's trunk that is causing the
> failures in scxml.
>
<snap/>

Thanks for going the extra mile. Thats the next thing I would've tried
since both failing tests use EL. I will take a look at what gives in
EL, though can't say when.

-Rahul


> Stefan
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org