Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88573 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2010 16:02:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 31 Aug 2010 16:02:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 61920 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2010 16:02:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 61830 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2010 16:02:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 61822 invoked by uid 99); 31 Aug 2010 16:02:51 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:02:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.43] (HELO mail-vw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.212.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:02:29 +0000 Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so5776178vws.30 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:02:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PcdA+BYGZFmcb3aQzoWp6UKcGy0HwLeYaP7y7ad1q4E=; b=BIJTaAPEiyk1D8OEU1QVRTt5qjiOYGs1rxplWBWXivqCq3c0bULEdz79lbOy8584S/ T1sLJ5iwwl7r97VRZjMTRhUR/8iqxBFGQM0NDCyGpqrOStnLcpQDt6crmf4ly/MrLPvh 105Irex7tA3w1AbDa52yk4Mp4GGJZfUezTgVA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ifzXztY8ItYpnHah9iBFjXkDOafyKCY14r++5khfHYLyO6rkPkihl5sacWLotfsfDa 2376b9MeM7I9qK14BTE4uKNg65NfMFO1jMaulk9JpT0zhJvSz0RxVPG9bJHgJ8uRM6m2 e7cAElHBP2/Inp8vm1W9N8RF6VGzSX523LjCg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.158.9 with SMTP id d9mr3270906vcx.250.1283270523310; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.114.84 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:02:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:02:02 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Digester] working toward a release From: sebb To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 31 August 2010 14:39, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Rahul, > I just added the xdoc version of the documentation present in the > package.html files. The package.html files are normally used to annotate the Javadoc output. However in this case these files have got a lot more content than is normally present in the Javadoc. > Do you think these last can be removed, since > would be redundant with the new developers guide? There should at least be minimal package.html files for Javadoc usage, so I don't think the files should be removed entirely, but they could be replaced with much simpler versions. > At this stage, we > should maintain two different data sources with same information, I'd > propose to drop the existing one, but let choose together. > Another small question: in src/conf there is a MANIFEST.MF[1] file > that contains informations that maven can generate automatically, do > you think we can drop it, when dropping the ant build? +1 to dropping MANIFEST.MF. > Thanks in advance, have a nice day! > Simo > > [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/digester/trunk/src/conf/MANIFEST.MF > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Simone Tripodi >> wrote: >>> Hi All guys, >>> since the Commons PMC awarded me giving me the writing rights, I'd >>> like to work on the Digester to publish a new release, since a new >>> feature will be contained. >> >> >> Super! >> >> >>> For what I can see, there are few build-related minor issues: >>> >>> - ant build: dropped in Gump, do we want to maintain it or completely remove? >> >> >> Upto you, can remove IMO. >> >> >>> - maven build: do we want to maintain the current directory structure >>> or move to the default structure? >> >> >> If you want to improve it, great. >> >> >>> - documentation: It would be nice, IMHO, porting the current >>> documentation from the package.html files to apt format to be included >>> in the generated site. Existing xdoc can also ported to the apt ormat. >>> WDYT? >> >> >> +1 to porting to package.html to a "guide" on the website. >> >> I like xdoc, I don't like apt much. However, its unlikely that I will >> be writing much [digester] documentation hereafter. Perhaps its best >> that you write the new docs in the format of your choosing and leave >> any of the old stuff as-is. >> >> >>> - code: a review wouldn't be bad :P >>> >> >> >> Generally looked OK. You can help yourself to Checkstyle, Clirr, CPD, >> FindBugs, PMD, RAT and friends (in fact, it'd be great to do that >> before the release anyway). >> >> -Rahul >> >> >> >>> Please let me know, have a nice day!!! >>> Simo >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org