commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Xun Long Gui <ustbco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [scxml-eclipse] User Feedback
Date Mon, 09 Aug 2010 02:12:15 GMT
Hi Jake,
Thanks for your reply. It seems that we should re-define transition EMF data
model for this tool, rebuild the tool from the base. I will read SCXML
transition specification carefully and carry on the rebuild job

在 2010年8月9日 上午9:22,Jacob Beard <jbeard4@cs.mcgill.ca>写道:

> Hi, Long,
>
> Replies below:
>
> On 10-08-08 09:06 PM, Xun Long Gui wrote:
> > I do not think we can create a transition without a target, target is a
> > necessary element for a transition.
> >
> The spec says that the target attribute on transition is not required.
> In that case, I think the semantics are similar to a Static Reaction, as
> defined in the paper describing the Rhapsody semantics of statecharts.
> From the spec:
>
> The identifier(s) of the state or parallel region to transition to. If
> it is omitted, the transition will not cause a change in the state
> configuration when it is executed. The executable content contained in
> the transition will still be executed, so the transition will function
> as a simple event handler. If the target is present and equal to the
> state containing the transition element, the transition will cause the
> state machine to leave and then re-enter this state.
>
> From: http://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/#transition
> > To feature 1 and 3 in Chris's commends, we can achieve them, not a big
> > thing. What do you mean about "showstoppers" bug ?
> >
> What I mean is that I think these things are critical to usability.
>
> Jake
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Best Regards

Gui Xun Long (桂训龙)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message