Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21072 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2010 17:06:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Jul 2010 17:06:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 2106 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 17:06:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 1938 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 17:06:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 1930 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2010 17:06:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:06:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.178] (HELO mail-qy0-f178.google.com) (209.85.216.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:06:40 +0000 Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so4797768qyk.9 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.60.211 with SMTP id q19mr9990588qah.87.1279127119458; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:05:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jcarman@carmanconsulting.com Received: by 10.229.82.15 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:04:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: James Carman Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:04:58 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: RTNei1ldJq2AOzNV9z4P7QgyKFM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DIGESTER] back proposing the sandbox features To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Why not just use JAXB 2.0 which includes annotations? What itch does this code scratch that hasn't been done already? Does your code support going from the objects to the XML? Most of the time when you have these XML -> object situations, it's nice to be able to go the other way, also (such as is the case with JAXB). On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, Digester maintainers, > time ago[1] I proposed a sandbox[1] to work on a new feature for the > digester, adding the Java5 Annotation analysis to create Digester > rules. > I didn't have the need to modify the original digester code, but > rather I added a new package where adding the new feature, and without > adding any new dependency. > Time has passed, progresses on the design have been done, tests[3] go > on green bar :) > I'd really appreciate if anyone can help me on: > > * promoting that code on the current /trunk development (I'm already > an Apache committer/PMC member, but not in commons); > * writing the documentation (I'm not a native English speaker). > > I'm confident we can include that feature in the next Digester > release, I really hope someone can help me :) > Have a nice day, best regards, > Simo > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/w33bwwfnbev75fuv > [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk > [3] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/digester/annotations/ > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org