Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gudnabrsam@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.43 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id
         :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer;
        b=RYZTQ9u0Uz3K9OH4RGAweSf3F5HkcQoWghMuLCvemneBNKCJgSs/NnD7KgIpC7KE8f
         +GkuTRJsvBkMa4i2U7EyD8kyLdZphIF0eWKRTc00O6MpgtHyeeQD8thEXdwGlAwLWItV
         FkPhd7we/xq2Egn3J1Nb3QeNZxD1bcLRvQyOk=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
In-Reply-To: <i1qn43$eep$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <AANLkTik6lPlzVcxo3ozIfGW96Olvujx4qxxM3lcvsY5z@mail.gmail.com>
 <D9E27E24-0D4E-4FF5-9D7D-DB004ACBD5E8@gmail.com>
 <AANLkTik5j-ybVmpAmsv2U_P9TIsoU0-8ldufgeWxDnrL@mail.gmail.com>
 <45BA46FE-7E47-4AB4-ADDD-13F5C79B2243@gmail.com>
 <AANLkTilPmnSEQ7IitA0WgjIJYRw0GfThsHKUF2NIW8eL@mail.gmail.com>
 <i1qn43$eep$1@dough.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <07011809-1BDB-46B9-93A5-47A3672D4EF3@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [proxy] Changing the API to an interface (AGAIN)...
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:00:48 -0500
To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>


On Jul 16, 2010, at 5:40 PM, J=F6rg Schaible wrote:

> James Carman wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Matt Benson =20
>> <gudnabrsam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> But you can agree that making the first class a separate argument
>>> preserves the usability of varargs while accomplishing the typed =20
>>> result
>>> in a single method?
>>>
>>
>> Most definitely!  I like that idea.  I would think that would be the
>> best way to kill two birds with one stone.
>
> This move worked out for proxytoys quite well ... ;-)

Not sure why one of our own never mentioned the existence of =20
ProxyToys, but go figure.  ;)  I hate to exhibit NIH, but since I =20
jumped into [proxy] partly to find a home for my fluent stubbed proxy =20=

code, I guess I'll persevere here.

That said, James:  what do you think about the fact that in ProxyToys =20=

*everything* is about Invokers, and everything else is expressed in =20
those terms.  So where [proxy] has an Interceptor, ProxyToys has a =20
Decorating Invoker, and where [proxy] delegates to an ObjectProvider, =20=

ProxyToys uses a DelegatingInvoker.  I can see how this makes for a =20
simpler interface.

-Matt

>
> - J=F6rg
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org