commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject Re: Upgrading commons-lang
Date Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:06:47 GMT
>From the [vote] thread, the release we're voting on is not intended to
be released into the "wild" (the central maven repo).  So, I don't
know if this will help you guys or not.

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:
> folks, please keep on voting.
> There are a few projects eager to use beta.3 or however it's gonna be named as
> long it's not a SNAPSHOT :)
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
>> To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
>> Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 1:14:50 PM
>> Subject: Re: Upgrading commons-lang
>>
>> maybe we can ask Henri and Sebb to push a commons-lang-3.0-pre-1  release?
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message  ----
>> > From: David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
>> > To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >  Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 11:35:01 PM
>> > Subject: Re: Upgrading  commons-lang
>> >
>> > I have no problems with using snapshots during  development but IMO we can't
>>
>> >release with snapshot  dependencies.  Do you have any concrete info on when
>>the
>>
>> >commons-lang release might be?
>> >
>> > thanks
>> > david  jencks
>> >
>> > On Jul  28, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Matt Benson  wrote:
>> >
>> > > Commons-Lang 3.0-SNAPSHOT  was published  yesterday.  Its APIs have
been
>> >updated for generics and   varargs, and because its Maven artifactId and java
>
>> >package names have  been  changed, the upgrade path is a painless one.
>> >Additionally, and most  importantly to me at present, lang3 has a  TypeUtils
>> >class that can replace and  augment bval-jsr303's  existing TypeUtils class.
>>I
>>
>> >would say that in all  likelihood  lang 3.0 will be released before bval 1.0.
>>I
>>
>> >would think the   upgrade would be more a question of 'when' rather than
>>'if'...
>>
>> >how would  you all  feel about allowing snapshot dependencies for
>>0.x-incubating
>>
>> >releases after  0.2-incubating?
>> > >
>> > >  Matt
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message