Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3631 invoked from network); 5 May 2010 18:22:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 May 2010 18:22:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 63918 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 18:22:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 63837 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 18:22:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 63829 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2010 18:22:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 18:22:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.43] (HELO mail-fx0-f43.google.com) (209.85.161.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 18:22:30 +0000 Received: by fxm14 with SMTP id 14so4261370fxm.30 for ; Wed, 05 May 2010 11:22:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9PHfjccvdyq3tBW/+yRyBgMyvnKMnXb+hy2lArEgfBU=; b=bXiQ4+hrp3Z/X60HdXXKouurda5uMMJfIIWriQHzW8Bbfgygb3npLpddGYBjcVUC6v 6iS5BKhoDRjZ5awYRp/RMSdm0fw1U2fh/lNRxZ4ZWffg/TTYXd8nHasqUQK0Fd4/Wl0S ih0ML9J9E7LE5MmvbqvO+yOuCYwiMHg4BaHww= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=qmowTWpVTAakPbOhhEWcfjaSKTW1ZkDCpWgb99bUKPZ7qXrwQhIHDIvhcZ+rUJ8nRx fDM/ts99VnafmSW8u2KPXEZPhiZzoiCboYF7PS74PBAP/5I4OoxKXQzs3L3FNXmlosiB e/cQsXNHngd17mP9gOKTc/aD6xnxvel6fq9dE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.145.73 with SMTP id r9mr1564924hba.22.1273083730242; Wed, 05 May 2010 11:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.239.173.67 with HTTP; Wed, 5 May 2010 11:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 19:22:10 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: [NET] 1.5.0 - worth releasing? From: sebb To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org There have been quite a few changes to the NET 1.x line since 1.4.1; it seems a shame to lose these entirely. Just wondering whether it is worth doing a final release of the 1.x code line? Or do people think there's no point? I'm happy to attempt the RM, unless anyone else wants to do it. Note: the version still builds and runs OK on Java 1.3+, whereas NET 2.0 requires Java 1.5+. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org