commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Future of Transaction subproject
Date Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:30:25 GMT
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
<jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/4/7 Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>:
>
>> * Tempted to leave the SVN as is, but make it read-only; rather than
>> do a move to dormant/. I think we should avoid changing the svn
>> location of released components.
>
> Disagree with that point. A committer can be expected to deal with SVN
> moves, otherwise he or she won't be able to deal with branches. And
> for the user it is best to have a clear distinction between sandbox,
> proper and dormant. (Whether we call it dormant, retired, or whatever
> doesn't matter.)
>
<snip/>

I say move out of proper in SVN (to dormant / retired / TBD) as well.

-Rahul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message