commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oliver Zeigermann <oliver.zeigerm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Future of Transaction subproject
Date Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:45:13 GMT
Folks!

The only discussion seems to be about "how to retire the project", not
"if to retire the project". This means to me we all agree to at least
temporarily retire it and there is no more discussion about how to do
it.

As the Apache commons way of retiring seems to be to move it to the
dormant section that is what I propose.

What are the next steps? Do we need a formal vote? Or are we just doing it?

- Oliver

2010/3/29 Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org>:
> +1 to push any inactive projects to the attic. they can always be
> moved back if real activity begins.
>
> 2010/3/28 Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>:
>> 2010/3/28 Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com>:
>>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> 2010/3/28 Rafał Krupiński <r.krupinski@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> On 28.03.2010 20:13, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>>>> Unless anyone speaks up for it, I'm all for our making a Retired
>>>>>>> section and moving Transaction to it. Possibly we could relabel
>>>>>>> 'Dormant' then to be more Sandbox focused and consider some others
for
>>>>>>> Retired (Attributes, Discovery, Modeler jump to mind).
>>>>>> You mean something like Apache Attic?
>>>>> Fair point. Let's assume moving it to the Attic. I'm not sure it'll be
>>>>> a perfect fit, but if it doesn't we can always maintain our own
>>>>> Retired page.
>>>>
>>>> I guess I shouldn't be telling you how the attic works, but IMO its
>>>> for projects which don't have a functioning PMC. Thats not the case
>>>> for Commons so I think it would be better to keep *retired* components
>>>> here.
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1 - and I am not sure we can really distinguish "retired" from
>>> "dormant."  Not breathing is not breathing and resurrection is
>>> resurrection. :)
>>
>> Xang went to the Attic from the XML PMC, and Slide + Taglibs (minus
>> those that went to Tomcat) are expected to go there from Jakarta, so
>> it's definitely not been limited only to those without PMCs. I think
>> we could do either option and am not tied to either.
>>
>> Attic-wise... I was thinking of making a page there, much as Taglibs
>> will have, which will list retired components.
>>
>> Commons-wise, we'd have a retired page and probably link to it from
>> the Attic page as an FYI. So really all we're talking about is the url
>> for the retired page and the process for restarting a component.
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message