Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16924 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2010 00:16:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2010 00:16:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 42127 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2010 00:16:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 42034 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2010 00:16:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 42026 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2010 00:16:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:16:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.218 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.218] (HELO mail-fx0-f218.google.com) (209.85.220.218) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:15:53 +0000 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so37674fxm.10 for ; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:15:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=K4/8xJPQWgf+fBC1iGxHxoCNq2tN+Guvde03d6JoQ6c=; b=lwebWL0+xVCnJYK5L4Q5oiIlf0jGcPFK3RXWul+V+IwYhqaXTaFNvxKnSor7upnWRr /3s4aWCsV+pfYs8ivEViJWdS5E31exYuz4BnH7lfb+WnYI7rv9rQmaSeHr6+Gt30yeLQ JrMqyIz6QidP7Z+W2GWcQX2uu8vBXkraT7ctU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=No/JUWhmFXkaQsIvnFxevEIYLPw9Ha2y2+DDxnlECRHyvYkDVJTNYPZEuVtYWV1g9P 9kGNaJ3xKvQd7Pa3QXrw/FnNnLQQsmEBMLpcbLP5+cfnUZBX++F4wDZa09PngyBl5iN5 9e8KE1adC6O5HzwDC/Th5xeLW9wLt8tAgDldA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.164.14 with SMTP id r14mr117037hbd.60.1267834532452; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:15:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 00:15:32 +0000 Message-ID: <25aac9fc1003051615n6fc2382w9fc285f8aa796915@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [IO] Next version of IO - should this be 2.0? From: sebb To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The trunk pom.xml refers to 1.5-SNAPSHOT, but it seems to me that the next release should be 2.0 rather 1.5, as IO now requires Java 1.5, that requires a major version change. Does that make sense? If so, then the maven id can also be fixed (see IO-125). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org