Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46127 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2010 18:28:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2010 18:28:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 99711 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 18:28:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 99580 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 18:28:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 99572 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2010 18:28:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:28:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.158] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:28:06 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so503141fgg.6 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:27:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CaE/9fSPQqWUwhoF/aPU7jeFV2zcFFrLnRo2crq9I0E=; b=PsAH4NiPD1DQfNoaLNI2s0fSzHultMfGNuvggoQNS+yejyD1HagiFP4+W+/9UJ0lSx NWXFUIlvsWk0BAyG1uDEElQNLwnZsC+OEQrsjomOqWMZPxqGmY+UfHOvD2wSQRnNufam /dVCLAzRRroyLm7MJNQaZ5fgJ7Aj7/wVI9RoQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=inUkq8azpxkcV3VF4ou02xEU6YlG4B1WzXUy8Rsh5FSDOLzZyKAznRF7X1KetQ/F5s UXSyGguLqAkkBYGktvGLpGPJi0B6M1ZHLG5VN3BvJDIoK7wQ6wBPP4syIwwC5XkC6Kcr 7ZEXQFuXPvrHPjjSM7OMXvBO6J4P3QQSeGnRE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.191.209 with SMTP id c17mr1091969hbi.177.1267727265912; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:27:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87iq9cjhm4.fsf@v35516.1blu.de> References: <87iq9cjhm4.fsf@v35516.1blu.de> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:27:45 +0000 Message-ID: <25aac9fc1003041027s673d21e5l2c0317f1f2a72543@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [COMPRESS] Jar*Stream COMPRESS-18 From: sebb To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 04/03/2010, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > while investigating an Ant issue I recently had a look at how Harmony > implements JarInputStream and friends. > > If we wanted to enable the usual JarEntry fields on top of > ZipArchiveInputStream we'd be forced to re-implement the whole > verification process for signed jars that the class library can already > do for us (in some hidden code we cannot re-use from the outside). > > The more I think about this, the more I believe we should make > JarArchiveInputStream use the java.util.jar package rather than extend > ZipArchiveInputStream - this would also mean we'd break the API of 1.0, > though. Seems good to me. Presumably JarArchiveOutputStream should also be changed? > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org