commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [COMPRESS] Jar*Stream COMPRESS-18
Date Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:06:20 GMT
On 2010-03-04, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 04/03/2010, Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org> wrote:

>>  The more I think about this, the more I believe we should make
>>  JarArchiveInputStream use the java.util.jar package rather than extend
>>  ZipArchiveInputStream - this would also mean we'd break the API of 1.0,
>>  though.

> Seems good to me.
> Presumably JarArchiveOutputStream should also be changed?

Yes, as well as JarArchiveEntry.  Neither of the three classes would
subclass their Zip* counterparts anymore.  That's the API breakage I was
talking about.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message