commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Phil Steitz <>
Subject Re: Future of Transaction subproject
Date Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:24:18 GMT
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Henri Yandell <> wrote:
>> 2010/3/28 Rafał Krupiński <>:
>>> On 28.03.2010 20:13, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>> Unless anyone speaks up for it, I'm all for our making a Retired
>>>> section and moving Transaction to it. Possibly we could relabel
>>>> 'Dormant' then to be more Sandbox focused and consider some others for
>>>> Retired (Attributes, Discovery, Modeler jump to mind).
>>> You mean something like Apache Attic?
>> Fair point. Let's assume moving it to the Attic. I'm not sure it'll be
>> a perfect fit, but if it doesn't we can always maintain our own
>> Retired page.
> I guess I shouldn't be telling you how the attic works, but IMO its
> for projects which don't have a functioning PMC. Thats not the case
> for Commons so I think it would be better to keep *retired* components
> here.

+1 - and I am not sure we can really distinguish "retired" from
"dormant."  Not breathing is not breathing and resurrection is
resurrection. :)


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message